The Story of Ejection Seats (Part 1)

During World War II, parachutes had become an essential life-saving tool for military aircraft. In an emergency, the pilot would first open the canopy, unfasten the seat belt, then climb out of the cockpit, jump out, open the parachute, and land on the ground. At the time, the success rate of this life-saving method was still very high, at around 90%.

However, as the flight speed of the aircraft continued to increase, it became increasingly difficult for the pilot to climb out of the cockpit and complete the parachute escape solely by relying on his physical strength. In addition, when parachuting at high speeds, the pilot could easily collide with the aircraft’s wings and vertical tail. Studies at the time showed that if the aircraft’s flight speed reached 500 kilometers per hour, the pilot had to rely on external force to leave the aircraft in an emergency and parachute to save his life, so the ejection seat came into being.

Everard Richard Calthrop, a famous British railway engineer, decided to start research on parachutes (pictured is his
Everard Richard Calthrop, a famous British railway engineer, decided to start research on parachutes (pictured is his "Guardian Angel" parachute) and promote it in the British Air Force during World War I after witnessing the air crash of his close friend, Charles Rolls, the founder of Rolls-Royce. It was also during the same period that he proposed the idea of ​​a compressed air ejection seat and applied for a patent.


Germany’s first trial of ejection seats during World War II

Although the concept of ejection seats can be traced back to the 1920s or even earlier, truly practical ejection seats did not appear until the late World War II. Germany and Sweden were the first to equip a new generation of high-performance fighters with ejection seats that were usable. The original ejection seats used springs or compressed air as the power source for ejection out of the cabin. Although the technical conditions were limited at the time, this was a great improvement in the pilot’s life-saving method.

One of the many ejection seat patents applied by German engineers during World War II
One of the many ejection seat patents applied by German engineers during World War II
Continuous footage of the use of ejection seats on German fighter planes during World War II, the ejection seat popped out of the cockpit and jumped over the vertical tail of the aircraft
Continuous footage of the use of ejection seats on German fighter planes during World War II, the ejection seat popped out of the cockpit and jumped over the vertical tail of the aircraft
The compressed air ejection seat equipped for the He-162 jet fighter during World War II in Germany
The compressed air ejection seat equipped for the He-162 jet fighter during World War II in Germany

Germany pioneered the first on the small-batch Heinkel He-280 jet fighter, equipped with a compressed air ejection seat. On January 13, 1943, test pilot Helmut Schenk used this to "escape" during the test flight of the He-280, becoming the first pilot to use an ejection seat to leave the plane in an emergency and be successfully rescued. By the end of World War II, Germany had at least 60 records of pilots successfully ejected and saved their lives.

At the same time, the Germans also discovered some inherent deficiencies of compressed air ejection seats, such as the heavy weight of the compressed air container, easy leakage, and low ejection energy. Therefore, the ejection seat powered by gunpowder became another emerging technology route at the time. It not only has more advantages in ejection energy, but also has a lighter system, takes up less space, and is easier to maintain.


Swedish Saab develops ejection seats on demand

Similar to Germany, Swedish Saab (SAAB) also began designing ejection seats based on its own needs in 1941. Its demand was that the latest fighter J-21 used a pusher tail propeller, which could pose a danger to parachuting pilots. Initially, Saab’s ejection seat chose to use compressed air as the power, but later cooperated with Bofors (a well-known anti-aircraft gun manufacturer) to develop a gunpowder-powered ejection seat.

After successfully completing the dummy test in 1944, all J-21 series fighters were equipped with ejection seats. In July 1946, the Swedish ejection seat successfully saved the life of their own pilot. After the war, Swedish Saab’s ejection seat went through several generations of development. In addition to equipping its own fighters, it was also exported. However, in the 1980s, facing the products of Martin and Baker, Saab was not competitive enough and its own demand was not large, so it gave up the development of ejection seats. The last domestically produced Swedish ejection seat was installed on the Saab J-37 "Torn". The later JAS-39 "Gripen" fighter used Martin Baker’s Mk10L ejection seat.

This Saab J-21 fighter in the museum recreates the scene of the ejection seat ejecting out of the cabin
This Saab J-21 fighter in the museum recreates the scene of the ejection seat ejecting out of the cabin


The jet age must have an ejection seat

After the war, with the advent of the jet age, the speed of aircraft became faster and faster, until it broke the sound barrier. It was impossible for pilots to escape by parachuting manually in the past. The demand for ejection seats became more urgent. In the introduction of the German materials, not only the physical objects and technical materials of the ejection seats of Nazi Germany in World War II were seized by the Allies, but also the basic medical achievements directly related to the development of ejection seats.

During the ejection process of the ejection seat, how much acceleration can the pilot’s body (especially the spine) withstand, and what is the limit? In the early stage of the ejection seat research in World War II, Germany conducted targeted research on the ejection facility at Berlin Tempelhof Airport. In the research and testing, both corpses and prisoners from the Sachsenhausen concentration camp were used. After the war, data and information in this area were applied and transformed on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, and aviation medical researchers in Nazi Germany also worked for the United States and other countries after escaping trial.

The Netherlands demonstrated the ejection seat on its National Aviation Day in 1959. The changes in the expressions of the onlookers showed people’s novelty and surprise at this new thing.
The Netherlands demonstrated the ejection seat on its National Aviation Day in 1959. The changes in the expressions of the onlookers showed people’s novelty and surprise at this new thing.
This ejection seat for fighter pilots integrates multiple disciplines such as mechanics, electronic pyrotechnics, pneumatics, ergonomics, and aviation physiology and hygiene. It is a key equipment to ensure the safety of pilots’ lives. At present, only four countries in the world, the United States, Britain, Russia, and China, have the ability to develop ejection seats. The picture shows two ejection seats exhibited at the 2016 Zhuhai Air Show
This ejection seat for fighter pilots integrates multiple disciplines such as mechanics, electronic pyrotechnics, pneumatics, ergonomics, and aviation physiology and hygiene. It is a key equipment to ensure the safety of pilots’ lives. At present, only four countries in the world, the United States, Britain, Russia, and China, have the ability to develop ejection seats. The picture shows two ejection seats exhibited at the 2016 Zhuhai Air Show


Martin-Baker has successfully saved 7,664 times

Martin-Baker was founded in 1934 by James Martin and Valentine Baker. The company’s initial product was aircraft, and Baker, an ace pilot in World War I, was the company’s test pilot. In September 1942, the Martin-Baker MB.3 prototype was on its tenth flight. Due to engine failure, the aircraft rolled over and caught fire during an emergency landing, and Baker was unfortunately killed. This was undoubtedly a major setback for Martin-Baker. Martin, who lost his close friend and business partner, decided to develop an ejection seat that could save pilots’ lives.

Martin Baker’s 5-meter ejection test bench, related tests from the initial ejection sandbag to Bernard Lynch sitting on it
Martin Baker’s 5-meter ejection test bench, related tests from the initial ejection sandbag to Bernard Lynch sitting on it
Bernard Lynch completed the first air flight ejection test of the Martin Baker ejection seat. Such air ejection once became the exclusive signature project of Martin Baker in the air show
Bernard Lynch completed the first air flight ejection test of the Martin Baker ejection seat. Such air ejection once became the exclusive signature project of Martin Baker in the air show
The beginning of the Martin Baker legend, Pre-Mk1 ejection seat
The beginning of the Martin Baker legend, Pre-Mk1 ejection seat

Later, in 1944, the British Aircraft Production Department commissioned Martin Baker to develop the ejection seat. When Martin Baker decided to develop a gunpowder-powered ejection seat, the first thing to be solved was how much acceleration the human body could withstand during the upward ejection process: what was the limit. After Martin-Baker completed a series of ejection tests on 90 kg (200 lb) dummies in early 1945, a fitter named Bernard Lynch in the factory bravely stood up and finally obtained data through his "human test". After a series of ground tests, on July 24, 1946, Lynch completed the first air flight ejection test of the Martin-Baker ejection seat. At an altitude of 2,400 meters, Lynch ejected from the back seat of a 510 km/h Gloster "Meteor" 3 fighter. The ejection seat worked well and Lynch landed perfectly. Subsequently, Lynch successfully conducted more than 30 ejection tests under various conditions, which eventually laid the foundation for the finalization of the first generation of Martin-Baker ejection seat.

The person standing in the picture is Lancaster, the first person to actually use the Martin-Baker ejection seat, and the man with a mustache in the cockpit is his
The person standing in the picture is Lancaster, the first person to actually use the Martin-Baker ejection seat, and the man with a mustache in the cockpit is his "predecessor" Lynch
On September 13, 1962, outside Hatfield Airport in Hertfordshire, England, at a very low altitude, test pilot Bob Sorey on the Lightning F1 fighter ejected to save his life (the ejection seat model is Martin-Baker Mk.4). The photographer of this legendary photo is the test pilot’s neighbor Jim Mize, who wanted to take a flight photo for his neighbor that day
On September 13, 1962, outside Hatfield Airport in Hertfordshire, England, at a very low altitude, test pilot Bob Sorey on the Lightning F1 fighter ejected to save his life (the ejection seat model is Martin-Baker Mk.4). The photographer of this legendary photo is the test pilot’s neighbor Jim Mize, who wanted to take a flight photo for his neighbor that day

After the birth of Martin-Baker’s first mass-produced ejection seat Pre-Mk1, in a test flight of the Armstrong Whitworth AW52 flying wing verification aircraft in May 1949, test pilot John O. Lancaster used this ejection seat for the first time in actual application. For more than 70 years since then, Martin-Baker’s ejection seats have been widely used on Western fighters. As of now, data from Martin-Baker’s official website shows that its ejection seats have successfully saved pilots’ lives 7,664 times.


From a variety of models to American standardization

The development of ejection seats in the United States after the war was not only digested and absorbed from German spoils of war, but also introduced the British Martin-Baker ejection seats and the "chaos" that eventually emerged: the developers include North American Douglas, Republic, Lockheed, Grumman and other aircraft companies, as well as ejection seat manufacturers such as Weber, Stanley and Stansell, and the users, the US Air Force and the US Navy, each taking what they need. Almost one type of ejection seat for each fighter, the "bad result" is a big trouble in cost and use and maintenance. The high initial procurement cost and spare parts cost are certain, and the pilots who use it and the ground crew who maintain it have to master one type of ejection seat after another.

Thus, in the mid-1970s, the U.S. military began to promote the standardized and universal ACES (Advanced Concept Ejection Seat), which brought benefits such as cost advantages of large-scale procurement and "burden reduction" for pilots and ground maintenance personnel. Initially, the development and production contracts for the ACES 2 ejection seat were awarded to McDonnell Douglas and Weber Aircraft. In the nearly half-century changes in the U.S. aviation manufacturing industry, Weber withdrew from the business. After McDonnell Douglas merged with Boeing, the ACES product line was transferred to Collins Aerospace, a subsidiary of Raytheon Technologies today.

A particularly classic photo about the ejection seat: the No. 6 aircraft of the U.S. Air Force
A particularly classic photo about the ejection seat: the No. 6 aircraft of the U.S. Air Force "Thunderbirds" flight demonstration team, ejected at the opening event of Mountain Home Air Force Base in Idaho in September 2003. The pilot was not injured and the aircraft avoided the crowd of spectators. Like the F-15, F-22, F-117, B-1B, B-2 and other models, the F-16 also uses the ACES2 ejection seat.
For the use of the ejection seat, the pilot must form muscle memory through repeated training on the trainer, which includes the pilot leaning back as much as possible in the
For the use of the ejection seat, the pilot must form muscle memory through repeated training on the trainer, which includes the pilot leaning back as much as possible in the "ejection preparation" stage, with the back of the torso as close to the backrest as possible, the head close to the headrest, the legs as close as possible, and the arms as close as possible.


After pulling the ejection handle

In an emergency, after the pilot pulls the ejection handle, the subsequent ejection life-saving procedures mainly include these stages: ejection preparation, ejection start, ejection channel clearing, ejection departure, ejection deceleration, separation of the person and the chair, and stable landing.

When the pilot decides to eject from the aircraft, he should maintain the correct ejection posture as much as possible. After the pilot completes the "ejection preparation", he pulls the ejection control handle quickly and forcefully with both hands at the same time (or with one hand) to activate the energy mechanism of the seat ejection control system, which completes the tasks of tightening the seat shoulder straps, tightening the waist belt, and lowering the arm limiter.

After the ejection control handle is activated, the first-stage power device of the ejection seat is automatically directly or indirectly activated, and at the same time, the work of "ejection channel clearing" is completed - either the canopy is jettisoned during the canopy ejection, or the canopy gun is fired or the micro-explosive cord is detonated during the canopy ejection.

After the first-stage power of the ejection seat is activated, the seat rises, and during the ascent, the leg limit belt is tightened, the oxygen supply on the aircraft is cut off, the emergency oxygen system on the seat is connected, the seat program control system is activated, the remote ignition system is fired and the second-stage power device is started. Under the joint action of the first-stage and second-stage ejection power systems, the person-seat system is ejected from the aircraft, and the divergence control of the ejection trajectory is performed.

Whether it is a two-seat fighter or a fighter with a crew of four, such as the EA-6B
Whether it is a two-seat fighter or a fighter with a crew of four, such as the EA-6B "Prowler" (above) and the S-3A "Viking" (below), the ejection trajectory interference that may occur between different seats, canopies and person-seat systems must be considered during ejection, especially at low speeds. Therefore, the ejection trajectory control technology (power device) and the command control system need to be coordinated to minimize the interval time between ejections of multiple crew members, and collisions in the air must be avoided.
The power device on the ejection seat ejects the person-chair system out of the cabin, which is only the first step. It is particularly important to ensure that the trajectory of the person-chair is changed in adverse conditions such as horizontal flight and inverted flight, especially to significantly increase the altitude to ensure that there is enough altitude and time to fully deploy the lifesaving parachute.
The power device on the ejection seat ejects the person-chair system out of the cabin, which is only the first step. It is particularly important to ensure that the trajectory of the person-chair is changed in adverse conditions such as horizontal flight and inverted flight, especially to significantly increase the altitude to ensure that there is enough altitude and time to fully deploy the lifesaving parachute.
On June 8, 1989, the MiG-29 fighter performing a flight show at the Paris Air Show caught fire because the engine swallowed a bird. The pilot decisively ejected 2.5 seconds before the plane touched the ground, and finally landed safely 30 meters away from the fireball of the crash explosion. The ejection was successful under extremely undesirable conditions. The performance of the K-36D ejection seat of the Soviet Union/Russia Red Star Design Bureau (Zvezda) amazed the world.
On June 8, 1989, the MiG-29 fighter performing a flight show at the Paris Air Show caught fire because the engine swallowed a bird. The pilot decisively ejected 2.5 seconds before the plane touched the ground, and finally landed safely 30 meters away from the fireball of the crash explosion. The ejection was successful under extremely undesirable conditions. The performance of the K-36D ejection seat of the Soviet Union/Russia Red Star Design Bureau (Zvezda) amazed the world.
The famous K-36D ejection seat even attracted the Americans after the Cold War to evaluate the possibility of modifying the K-36D on American aircraft and bring the K-36D back to the United States for testing (right picture). The picture shows its unique combination of hard stabilizer bar and stabilized deceleration parachute. However, in the end, the Americans did not buy Russian products in bulk, but applied many advantages of the K-36D to the improvement of ACES2.
The famous K-36D ejection seat even attracted the Americans after the Cold War to evaluate the possibility of modifying the K-36D on American aircraft and bring the K-36D back to the United States for testing (right picture). The picture shows its unique combination of hard stabilizer bar and stabilized deceleration parachute. However, in the end, the Americans did not buy Russian products in bulk, but applied many advantages of the K-36D to the improvement of ACES2.

After the ejection seat leaves the cabin, it relies on the action of the parachute gun or the parachute shooting mechanism to shoot out the stabilized deceleration parachute, or uses the hard stabilizer bar to stabilize and decelerate the person-chair system. At the same time, the ejection seat’s program control system completes the collection of airspeed and other signals.

As the stabilized deceleration parachute begins to work, after the ejection height reaches the set height of the control system, the restraint points between the seat and the pilot are released, and the life-saving parachute is ejected to separate the pilot from the seat. After opening the main parachute, the pilot descends steadily and lands safely, and uses the life-saving items carried to ask for help or save himself.

After the restraints between the seat and the pilot are released, the pilot and the seat are separated, and the number of openings steadily decreases
After the restraints between the seat and the pilot are released, the pilot and the seat are separated, and the number of openings steadily decreases
A close-up of the seawater-activated release device on the life-saving parachute strap. With this device, when landing on water, the parachute will automatically release after entering the water to prevent the parachute from dragging and drowning the pilot. In addition, the underarm life preserver, life-saving neck cover, etc., ensure that the pilot’s head floats above the water after entering the water
A close-up of the seawater-activated release device on the life-saving parachute strap. With this device, when landing on water, the parachute will automatically release after entering the water to prevent the parachute from dragging and drowning the pilot. In addition, the underarm life preserver, life-saving neck cover, etc., ensure that the pilot’s head floats above the water after entering the water


Is it a cover to be thrown or a cover to be penetrated

The "ejection channel clearing" stage in ejection life-saving is mainly to clear the canopy directly above the pilot that blocks the upward movement of the ejection seat. The methods adopted are mainly to throw the cover and to penetrate the cover. As the power source for jettisoning the canopy as a whole from the aircraft, there are high-pressure cold air type, high-pressure gas type (usually the two are backed up by each other), and there is also a canopy rocket type for dealing with larger and heavier canopies.

The white device at the front end of the F-22 canopy is the canopy rocket
The white device at the front end of the F-22 canopy is the canopy rocket
The AV-8B
The AV-8B "Sea Harrier" equipped by the US Marine Corps, the maintenance personnel are wiping the transparent part of the canopy with a white cloth, and the micro-explosive cord laid inside can be seen
The micro-explosive cord is a special linear explosive, which is filled in an alloy tube and laid inside the transparent part of the canopy. When the ejection seat is activated, the linkage mechanism will detonate the detonator in the detonation mechanism, and the micro-explosive cord will explode almost at the same time, producing the expected rupture effect on the transparent part of the canopy
The micro-explosive cord is a special linear explosive, which is filled in an alloy tube and laid inside the transparent part of the canopy. When the ejection seat is activated, the linkage mechanism will detonate the detonator in the detonation mechanism, and the micro-explosive cord will explode almost at the same time, producing the expected rupture effect on the transparent part of the canopy

However, for the ejection seat that uses the canopy ejection, the seat ejection power can only be activated after the canopy is completely jettisoned from the ejection channel. The time for throwing the canopy is generally 0.1 to 0.4 seconds, which will cause a loss of altitude in some unfavorable postures (such as a high rate of descent), affecting the life-saving effect. Therefore, the ejection channel is mostly cleared by penetrating the canopy, that is, when the seat is started, the transparent part of the canopy is pre-broken to reduce the load of the transparent part of the canopy on the pilot during the ejection process.

There are mainly two ways to penetrate the canopy. One is a canopy breaking gun, which breaks the transparent part of the canopy through a canopy breaking gun installed on the top of the ejection seat. This canopy breaking method is easier to implement and is effective for canopies with lower strength (non-directional glass, i.e. cast polypropylene or cast polymethacrylate glass materials). In the face of canopies with higher strength, better toughness, and less breakable (directional glass, i.e. stretched polypropylene or stretched polymethacrylate glass materials), it is necessary to use micro-explosive cords pre-laid on the transparent part of the canopy to directly explode the transparent part. In the ejection life-saving process where every second counts, there is no time delay for throwing the canopy, and the ejection seat that uses penetrating the canopy has significantly improved performance.

In May 2009, at Kandahar Air Force Base in Afghanistan, the Royal Air Force Harrier GR9A was ejected. At the same time, the micro-explosive cord in the canopy ejection can be seen to have exploded the canopy
In May 2009, at Kandahar Air Force Base in Afghanistan, the Royal Air Force Harrier GR9A was ejected. At the same time, the micro-explosive cord in the canopy ejection can be seen to have exploded the canopy
On the canopy of my country’s J-20 fighter, you can see the dual insurance of the micro-explosive cord and the canopy rocket
On the canopy of my country’s J-20 fighter, you can see the dual insurance of the micro-explosive cord and the canopy rocket

In the early models of the ejection seat, the ejection handle was set on the top of the seat. In this way, the pilot puts both hands on the ejection handle on the top of his head. When pulling, on the one hand, it ensures that the pilot’s posture is correct during ejection, and on the other hand, it pulls down the "curtain" and puts the pilot’s head and oxygen mask under the protection of the curtain to avoid the oncoming attack of high-speed airflow, avoiding the danger of the head being tossed and twisted under high-speed airflow.

In the design of the Martin-Baker ejection seat, the ejection handle originally added to the front of the seat between the pilot’s legs was auxiliary, to ensure that the pilot could smoothly pull the ejection handle and eject to survive when the pilot was overloaded by high G acceleration and could not raise his hands. But later this auxiliary design became the mainstream and completely replaced the ejection handle on the top of the ejection seat. The development of pilot helmet technology has also completely avoided the potential dangers of high-speed airflow blowing on the pilot’s face after ejection, such as facial deformation and lung damage.

In the 1950s, the U.S. Navy conducted a canopy ejection ground test on the F6U fighter, showing the design of the ejection handle placed on top
In the 1950s, the U.S. Navy conducted a canopy ejection ground test on the F6U fighter, showing the design of the ejection handle placed on top
The ejection handle of the ejection seat is set between the legs and has become the mainstream design. The handle is in eye-catching yellow or red
The ejection handle of the ejection seat is set between the legs and has become the mainstream design. The handle is in eye-catching yellow or red


Indispensable test link

In the process of developing the ejection seat, in order to verify whether its performance meets the design indicators, the ground comprehensive performance test link must be indispensable. The test equipment to be used includes the rocket sled rail. The rocket sled rail conducts a speed ejection test on the ejection seat. The solid rocket engine is used as the power to propel the sled to slide at high speed on the rail to simulate the flight speed. When the predetermined speed or predetermined position is reached, the seat is ejected, and the entire test process is recorded by electrical and optical measuring equipment. After the relevant ground ejection test is completed, the ejection seat must also undergo an air flight ejection test to be closer to the actual situation, especially to simulate the ejection in an unfavorable posture during maneuvering flight. Aerial ejection tests are usually conducted with dummies, and ejection test aircraft are generally modified from fighters, trainers or bombers with front and rear cabins.

Rocket sled rails are indispensable test equipment in the development of ejection seats. The two types of ejection seats tested in the photo are both products of Martin-Baker. The upper one is the Mk16 Lockheed Martin customized version US16E of the F-35 family, and the lower one is the Mk14 US Navy version NACES used by the F/A-18 family.
Rocket sled rails are indispensable test equipment in the development of ejection seats. The two types of ejection seats tested in the photo are both products of Martin-Baker. The upper one is the Mk16 Lockheed Martin customized version US16E of the F-35 family, and the lower one is the Mk14 US Navy version NACES used by the F/A-18 family.
To this day, Martin-Baker’s ejection test aircraft are still two Gloster
To this day, Martin-Baker’s ejection test aircraft are still two Gloster "Meteor" Mk.7 manufactured in 1949 and 1952. Its engine pod is located in the middle of the wing, which is very suitable for ejection seat testing. There is no need to worry about the canopy fragments or rocket gas being sucked into the engine intake during the test.
The
The "Stanley" C-1 ejection seat prepared for the F-104 in Stanley’s promotional page. Considering the ejection under supersonic conditions, it has a retractable "shock bar" design, but in reality its performance is really poor, especially at low altitudes, and it was eventually replaced with a conventional ejection seat that ejects upwards


Ejection is not all upwards

For the ejection of the ejection seat, it can be simply understood as a vertical and horizontal movement process. Within a certain period of time, the vertical rise of the ejection seat must exceed the height of the vertical tail, and this "certain period of time" must be very short (in other words, the rise speed of the ejection seat is fast enough), otherwise the person and the chair who just left the cabin will be "caught up" by the vertical tail behind. In addition, the strong blow of the oncoming airflow increases the risk of this "collision". Therefore, in the early stage of the development of the ejection seat, there was a "downward ejection" plan to completely avoid the vertical tail of the aircraft. But obviously this reduces the chance of survival compared to "upward ejection", especially in low-altitude flight. Therefore, fighters that use "downward ejection" ejection seats are extremely rare cases, including the F-104 "Star" fighter in the 1950s. It had to choose "downward ejection" at first because the F-104 flew too fast. It was the first mass-produced 2x supersonic fighter. In addition, its T-shaped vertical tail was designed to be very tall. If the ejection seat was ejected upward during supersonic flight, it would be "caught up" and collided with the vertical tail before it flew high enough.

It is not just a short-term application on the F-104 fighter. "Downward ejection" is still a "last resort" ejection life-saving solution on large platforms such as bombers. For example, on the representative US Air Force B-52 bomber, the seats of the two radar navigators are on the lower deck, so the ejection seat can only choose to eject downward. According to the public B-52G flight manual from the 1980s, it is clearly stated that the minimum altitude for "downward ejection" is 600 meters, and there are additional conditions. This data only applies to horizontal flight. It is acceptable for downward ejection in a dive state, but it is conservative for downward ejection in a climb state. There is no doubt that the survival rate of the two navigators in the B-52 crew is relatively disadvantaged during the ejection rescue, but it is still slightly more optimistic than the crew on the British Air Force’s "fire Soviet Tu-95 bomber" at the time. After all, the "later god" left the crew with only manual parachute for emergency escape.

The B-52G bomber that was
The B-52G bomber that was "chopped up" under the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, from which we can see the two navigator seats at the bottom of its nose, and its ejection seat ejected downward (pictured above). The picture below shows the crew ejection seats removed from the B-52. Each seat has a number corresponding to the crew seat, such as ECM (electronic countermeasures), navigator (Nav), co-pilot (Co-Pilot)
The picture shows the cockpit of the Tu-160, and the iconic red ejection ring on the K-36LM ejection seat can be seen
The picture shows the cockpit of the Tu-160, and the iconic red ejection ring on the K-36LM ejection seat can be seen

(To be continued)

The Story of Ejection Seats (Part 1)
Germany’s first trial of ejection seats during World War II
Swedish Saab develops ejection seats on demand
The jet age must have an ejection seat
Martin-Baker has successfully saved 7,664 times
From a variety of models to American standardization
After pulling the ejection handle
Is it a cover to be thrown or a cover to be penetrated
Indispensable test link
Ejection is not all upwards